Mismatch
cv.employers_share_registry_idTwo listed employers share company number 09112233 in the register
What this means
One entry under two names, so the same period was counted twice.
This is what you get. All of it, now, without signing up.
It is the output of the same run that plays on the front page. Eight findings over one application, each with its source, the time it was queried and the rule key that produced it.
Martina SvobodovaAccountant and finance specialist
Verification reportInvented candidate, real rulesRun of 6 August 2026, 9:41
Claims that contradict each other or diverge from the public register. A mismatch is not an accusation; it is a place where someone should ask.
Mismatch
cv.modified_before_createdFile metadata gives a modification date of 3 February 2026, earlier than the creation date of 6 August 2026
What this means
Two dates in one file contradict each other. We do not read the document author at all.
Worth a look
cv.overlapping_employmentThe periods listed for those two companies overlap by 22 months
What this means
Concurrent employment is common and means nothing on its own. Here it sits next to a shared company number.
Worth a look
cv.created_after_application_receivedThe file was created on 6 August 2026, two days after the application arrived
What this means
One ordinary reason is a re-saved PDF. We write it down because it can be checked.
Mismatch
reference.company_is_another_claimed_employerThe first referee works at a company the candidate lists as her own employer
What this means
So an independent party does not confirm that reference. The second referee, at Bilanco, is independent.
Neither a mismatch nor a finding about a person. We write them down so the period claimed has no missing piece, and because they can be checked.
Between 31 May 2021 and 1 January 2022 there is a gap of 7 months
A gap has a thousand reasons and none of them are our business. We write it down so the timeline has no missing piece.
Insurance period statement from social security and a criminal record extract
The link goes to the candidate, she obtains and submits the documents herself. Candora never writes to a former employer, a school or a referee. Not supplying a document is not a finding.
Checks that ran and found nothing. The report lists them, because a clean check is a result too, and without it you could not tell what was asked.
- CV and application4 with no finding
- Reference contact7 with no finding
- Domain registry and web archive3 with no finding
- DNS and MX records3 with no finding
- Register of schools and accreditations1 with no finding
- Company register2 with no finding
- International dialling code list1 with no finding
The source did not answer, or the answer was not enough. This is a statement about a source, not about a person, and it never counts against the candidate.
Accreditation of the programme for the period claimed could not be confirmed
The school register did not answer in time. This is a statement about a source, not about a person.
Checks that did not run at all, because the document they need was not there. One the run had only just requested, the other the candidate did not supply. Not running is not a finding about a person and never counts against one; it is here so the count adds up and you can see what is still pending.
- Employer statement4 with no input
- Work permit document2 with no input
One run over one application, 35 checks across nine areas. The full list of rules, and what we deliberately did not build, is on this site.
What this report does not contain, on purpose
- No score and no number that sums a person up
- No overall label such as passed or failed
- No pre-filled recommendation on how to decide
- No record of who created the document; we do not read the file author
Want this report over an application of your own?
Fourteen days free, no card. After that the account does not end, it continues on the free tier with 60 verifications a year. Or one verification per unit, when you have one specific person in mind.